|"We Discovered Ellen White Failed the Biblical Tests of a Prophet"|
for Real People
Crushing the Opposition
How Ellen White Treated Those Who Rejected Her
By D. Anderson
"People in all the churches soon began to get their eyes open, and came out decidedly against her visions; and, just as soon as they did so, she used to see them 'with spots on their garments,' as she expressed it. I was personally acquainted with several ministers, whom she saw landed in the kingdom with 'Oh! such brilliant crowns, FULL of stars.' As soon as they took a stand against the visions, she saw them 'doomed, damned, and lost for ever, without hope.'"1
Israel Dammon was an early associate of Mrs. White during 1845 and 1846. It was during this time that Dammon witnessed Ellen White's visions where she reportedly saw the door of salvation shut. Dammon soon came to the conviction that he must take his stand upon the "Word of the Lord" alone. Prior to this decision, Mrs. White had seen Dammon "in the kingdom in an immortal state, and crowned." After his decision to stand upon the Word of God she saw Dammon "finally lost."2
Snook and Brinkerhoff
In 1860, M.E. Cornell raised up a Sabbath-keeping church in Marion, Iowa. The church adopted a covenant stating:
"...whose covenant obligation is briefly expressed in keeping the commandments of God and faith of Jesus, taking the Bible, and the Bible alone, as the rule of our faith and discipline."Unfortunately, the harmony of the church was broken up a year and a half later when Cornell...
"...held up, publicly, some other volumes by the side of the Bible, of a recent date, and averred that these recent publications were of equal authority, and binding forever with the Bible, and urged us to adopt their teaching also, as a rule of faith and discipline."3The church in Marion was split in two over whether to accept the writings of Ellen White on an equal basis with the Bible. Soon the president of the Iowa conference, B.F. Snook, and the secretary, W.H. Brinkerhoff, began to openly question the divine inspiration of Ellen White. On November 30, 1865, the men withdrew their membership from the Seventh-day Adventist church. The reason they gave for their departure was their inability to accept the visions of Ellen G. White. Later, they published a book revealing many errors in Mrs. White's visions.
Prior to their departure from the church, Mrs. White had only praise for Snook and his family:
"Marion, Iowa, March 18, 1861.After their departure, Mrs. White assassinates Snook's character:
"When B. F. Snook embraced the truth, he was very destitute. Liberal souls deprived themselves of conveniences, and even of some of the necessaries of life, to help this minister, whom they believed to be a faithful servant of Christ. They did all this in good faith, helping him as they would have helped their Saviour. But it was the means of ruining the man. His heart was not right with God; he lacked principle. He was not a truly converted man. The more he received, the greater was his desire for means. He gathered all he could from his brethren, until he had been helped, through their liberalities, to a valuable home; then he apostatized, and became the bitterest enemy of the very ones who had been most liberal to him."5
In 1843, H.E. Carver heard the preaching of Millerite leader Joshua Himes and joined the 1844 movement. After the great disappointment, Carver moved to Iowa and began farming. In the early 1860s Carver heard a presentation by J.H. Waggoner in Iowa City and accepted the Sabbath. For a while Carver associated with the Seventh-day Adventists, but decided to take his stand upon the Word of God alone in the spring of 1866. He founded the Christian Publishing Association, and in 1877 published a number of highly embarrassing revelations about Mrs. White (click here to read).
Apparently an Adventist minister attempted to defend Mrs. White, and in so doing, he inadvertently gave Carver's book more publicity then Ellen White wanted. She was hoping the controversy would blow over without too much damage. She writes a stinging testimony criticizing the minister for attempting to reply to Carver:
"Your time can be better employed in having a more general interest and giving to the people food, meat that will feed them now. While your time is employed in following the crooks and turns of Preble you are not wise. You are bringing to their notice a work which has but limited circulation, and interesting minds in objections that they would never have been troubled with. You manufacture a train of quibbles and doubts for thousands of people and present his work to those who would never have seen it. This is just what they [our opponents] want to have done, to be brought to notice and we publish for them. This is what Carver wants. This is their main object in writing out their falsehoods and misrepresentations of the truth and the characters of those who love and advocate the truth."6Apparently Mrs. White preferred the evidence about her prophetic failures be suppressed rather than discussed and defended in a public forum.
D.M. Canright, a member of the SDA Church for 25 years, was a close associate with James and Ellen White and held a trusted position of leadership in the Church. He was a high church official, an insider, whose position in the church allowed him access to very damaging information about the "prophetess" Ellen White. He left the church in the 1880s, and eventually published a book revealing the truth about Ellen White (click here to read). D.M. Canright has been attacked and vilified by Seventh-day Adventists for over a century. Not even the Pope has taken as much abuse from Seventh-day Adventists as D.M. Canright. These attacks should be no surprise, however, because believers and critics alike agree that Canright's book, with its inside account of deception and cover-up, is the most devastating book ever written about Ellen White.
In 1880, when Canright was struggling over whether to leave the SDA church, Mrs. White wrote him a letter. She was apparently terrified about the damage Canright could do if he made the truth known, so she makes an urgent appeal for him to stay away from Seventh-day Adventists:
Battle Creek, Oct. 15, 1880
At one time Ellen White endorsed A.T. Jones as God's messenger. However, her tune changed when Jones and others began to question her prophetic ministry. In 1906, a number of concerns had been raised by the brethren in Battle Creek regarding Mrs. White's prophetic ministry. Mrs. White wrote a letter to the brethren asking that their concerns be written out and sent to her, and she would respond. She wrote:
"Recently in the visions of the night I stood in a large company of people. There were present Dr. Kellogg, Elders Jones, Tenny and Taylor, Dr. Paulson, Elder Sadler, Judge Arthur and many of their associates. I was directed by the Lord to request them and any others who have perplexities and grievous things in their minds regarding the testimonies that I have borne, to specify what their objections and criticisms are. The Lord will help me to answer these objections, and to make plain that which seems to be intricate."8The brethren obeyed Mrs. White's request, and sent a letter detailing their concerns. Mrs. White then contradicted herself by pronouncing it was not the Lord's will for her to answer these questions. A.T. Jones questioned why Mrs. White said the Lord would help her answer their questions, but when the questions were written out and sent to her, she refused to answer them. Mrs. White responded to this questioning by attacking Jones:
July 3, 1906 J -242- '06Here she writes a letter urging church members to avoid Jones and others skeptical of her calling. Apparently she is fearful of what they might say:
"A. T. Jones, Dr. Kellogg, and Elder Tenney are all working under the same leadership. They are classing themselves with those of whom the apostle writes, "Some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils." In the case of A. T. Jones, I can see the fulfillment of the warnings that were given me regarding him.
Albion Fox Ballenger was a Seventh-day Adventist minister in England. While studying the book of Hebrews he discovered that he could not establish the SDA doctrine of the Sanctuary from the Scriptures. His conscience bothered him so much that he decided not to preach on the subject again until he could explain it from the Scriptures. After spending many months studying the subject, he became convinced the SDA position was in error. After making his studies public, he was expelled from the church. In a letter to Mrs. White, Ballenger explains the difficult position he was put in, being forced to choose between the Bible and Ellen White:
"And now Sister White, what can I do? If I accept the testimony of the Scriptures, if I follow my conscientious convictions, I find myself under your condemnation; and you call me a wolf in sheep's clothing, and warn my brethren and the members of my family against me. But when I turn in my sorrow to the Word of the Lord, that Word reads the same, and I fear to reject God's interpretation and accept yours. Oh that I might accept both. But if I must accept but one, hadn't I better accept the Lord's? If I reject his word and accept yours, can you save me in the judgment? When side by side we stand before the great white throne; if the Master should ask me why I taught that 'within the veil' was in the first apartment of the sanctuary, what shall I answer? Shall I say, 'Because Sister White, who claimed to be commissioned to interpret the Scriptures for me, told me that this was the true interpretation, and that if I did not accept it and teach it I would rest under your condemnation?"11Rather than respond to the Biblical points raised by Ballenger, Mrs. White responds by denouncing Ballenger as being "led by" Satan because he did not believe in a doctrine found throughout her writings:
"I declare in the name of the Lord that the most dangerous heresies are seeking to find entrance among us as a people, and Elder Ballenger is making spoil of his own soul."12
Ellen White caught in a web of lies
Most amazingly, Ellen White blasted a Christian man for making statements about the salvation of other people:
"I know that God never gave mortal man such a message as that which Brother Nelson has borne concerning his brethren. It is not like our God. After the disappointment of 1844 there were those who would say to others, 'You are lost; you have gone too far to be saved.' Then I was brought to my feet to bid them in the name of the Lord to cease their condemnation. God has never empowered one mortal to say to another mortal, 'You are lost.'"14In 1901, Mrs. White claimed she rose to her feet to condemn such practices. Is this an accurate representation of her position and actions after 1844? Far from it! Mrs. White was one of the foremost in condemning as lost those who rejected William Miller. In fact, in her vision of the Advent people on the path to heaven, those who decided to depart from the Advent movement were described by her as follows:
"Others rashly denied the light behind them, and said that it was not God that had led them out so far. The light behind them went out leaving their feet in perfect darkness, and they stumbled and got their eyes off the mark and lost sight of Jesus, and fell off the path down in the dark and wicked world below. It was just as impossible for them to get on the path again and go to the City, as all the wicked world which God had rejected."15Later she reaffirmed those who rejected Miller were lost when she wrote:
"My accompanying angel bade me look for the travail of soul for sinners as used to be. I looked, but could not see it; for the time for their salvation is past."16In the following statement she writes out a vision in which she says Adventists who disagree with her shut door teaching will "die the death":
"They said the shut door was of the devil, and now admit it is against their own lives. They shall die the death."17In fact, for the rest of her life Mrs. White maintained that those who rejected William Miller's false time-setting movement in 1844 were lost. Here is what she wrote in 1883:
"I was shown in vision, and I still believe, that there was a shut door in 1844. All who saw the light of the first and second angels' messages and rejected that light, were left in darkness. And those who accepted it and received the Holy Spirit which attended the proclamation of the message from heaven, and who afterward renounced their faith and pronounced their experience a delusion, thereby rejected the Spirit of God, and it no longer pleaded with them. Those who did not see the light, had not the guilt of its rejection. It was only the class who had despised the light from heaven that the Spirit of God could not reach. And this class included, as I have stated, both those who refused to accept the message when it was presented to them, and also those who, having received it, afterward renounced their faith. These might have a form of godliness, and profess to be followers of Christ; but having no living connection with God, they would be taken captive by the delusions of Satan."18QUESTION: If, as she said in 1901, God never empowered any mortal to say to another mortal, "you are lost," then who empowered Ellen White to tell those who rejected Miller that they were lost?
You are lost!
A few more examples to ponder:
"The Lord has a work for Brother Craig to do, but if he is overcome by these outbursts on the part of his wife, he is a lost man, and she is not saved by the sacrifice."19
It is apparent that Ellen White believed herself to be the Spirit of Prophecy. This belief is apparently grounded in her visions (hallucinations) which she felt were given to her by the Holy Spirit. Therefore, anyone who questioned her visions, her teachings or her authority must be under the influence of the devil. Anyone who studied the Bible and arrived at a conclusion different from hers must be misapplying Scriptures. Anyone who rejected her authority must be lost, because they no longer accepted the "Spirit of Prophecy" (herself), and were therefore no longer a part of God's remnant church which had the Commandments of God and the Testimony of Jesus.
Many more examples could be given. These are sufficient to show that belief in Ellen White as a prophet was considered essential for being a member of God's remnant church, and those who rejected her as a prophet were "doomed," "damned," and "lost."
1. Miles Grant, An Examination of Mrs. White's Visions, Boston: Advent Christian Society, 1877. As cooberation of Grant's statement, after an unsuccessful visit to Paris, Mrs. White wrote: "I saw that they had not heeded the visions that God had given them, and unless they did heed them they would pass through awful trials and judgments." (Letter 3, 1851, written Aug. 11, 1851, to Harriet Hastings. Letter has not as of yet (Feb. 20, 2013) been released in its entirety to the public.)
3. Hope of Israel, Sep. 7, 1864.
4. Ellen White, An Appeal to the Youth, pp. 63,64.
5. Ellen White, Testimonies, Vol. 2, p. 625.
6. Ellen White, Manuscript Releases, vol. 13, p. 346.
7. Ellen White, Letter 1, 1880, published in Notebook leaflets from the Elmshaven Library, pp. 73-75.
8. Arthur L. White, Ellen G. White Biography, Vol. 6, p. 90.
9. Ellen White, Kress Collection, p. 33.
10. Ellen White, Loma Linda Messages, pp. 276, 277.
11. Albion F. Ballenger, Cast Out for the Cross of Christ, (1909).
12. Arthur L. White, Ellen G. White Biography, (The Early Elmshaven Years), vol. 5, p. 409.
13. Ellen White, Manuscript 59, 1905. Manuscript Release #760, p. 4.
14. Ellen White, Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, July 30, 1901.
15. Ellen White, A Word to the Little Flock, 1847.
16. Ellen White, Present Truth, Aug. 1, 1849.
17. Ellen White, Manuscript 11, 1850, pp. 3, 4, vision at Paris, Maine, December 25, 1850.
18. Ellen White, Selected Messages, vol. 1, p. 63.
19. Ellen White, Manuscript Releases, vol. 16, p. 304.
20. Ellen White, Manuscript Releases, vol. 15, p. 368.
21. Ellen White, Testimonies vol. 1, p. 428.
22. Ellen White, Testimonies to Ministers and Gospel Workers, p. 96.
23. Ellen White, Manuscript Releases, vol. 19, pp. 30-31.
24. Ellen White, Letter 30, 1850. The portion quoted is on file at the White Estate but it is unreleased by the White Estate as of Feb. 20, 2013. Other portions of this letter have been released in various volumes of Manuscript Releases.
All material on this web site is copyrighted © 2009 by nonegw.org